Archives for May 2018

Gunnison City leadership considers partnering with BYU to save money on new general plan with help from students


By Robert Stevens

Managing editor



GUNNISON—Gunnison City has a small window of time to decide if they want to partner with BYU to save thousands of dollars to create a new general plan.

The topic was broached during the most recent meeting of the Gunnison City Council on Wednesday, April 2.

Attending the meeting was Travis Kyhl, a representative of the Six County Association of Governments, who Gunnison Mayor Lori Nay contacted while looking into options for creating the city’s new general plan, or “comprehensive plan” as they are sometimes referred to.

The new general plan, which is long overdue for a revamp, is meant to encompass business, housing, economy, recreation and nearly every other aspect of life and municipal government in Gunnison City.

“We are glad to be able to help with this,” said Kyhl to the council. “We are an extension of you, and we want to help in any way we can.”

Kyhl explained there are a number of ways a city can update or create a general plan, including hiring a consultant (which he says costs upwards of $50,000 or more), doing it all in-house, or a combination of the two.

For the meeting last week, he brought with him Michael Clay, professor of urban planning at BYU, and several of Clay’s students to discuss an option that he said could get the city a whole lot of bang for their planning buck.

Clay and his students are part of a BYU partnership with Envision Utah, an acclaimed planning and growth co-operative launched in 1997 with the goal of keeping “Utah beautiful, prosperous, healthy, and neighborly for future generations.”

The program is a less expensive alternative to paying $50,000 to create the city plan. The cost of the program is reduced by using students who participate in the program for an educational credit experience in the planning fields.

The BYU-based program would still cost $15,000, but Kyhl said that he could help the city fund half of that amount through the Permanent Community Impact Board (CIB), which he said was a “sure thing.”

The city would have to get on board with the student-driven planning effort before the end of May, because the planning cycle would go from July 1 – Dec. 31, said Clay, but if they do choose to participate, they would get half of his class—which amounts to 10-12 students—putting in from 120-240 hours of work on the project each.

The project would take approximately six months of work, said Clay, and the only reason they wouldn’t have the entire class involved is because the town of Mona had just signed on to the program for its own planning assistance.

“We would inventory every manhole, road, stop sign and pothole in the entire town in the process,” Clay said. “We would be all over the place, making sure every aspect of the plan suits your needs.”

The group would leave no stone unturned in the planning—which includes community surveys to get public opinion, something many cities don’t do when they make their general plans.

Kyhl told the council that the inventory the BYU group would do alone would be worth the $7500 they would be on the hook for after he got them lined up with the CIB to fund the other $7500.

Clay told the council in the process of creating the plan they could even put emphasis on two items of particular interest to the city—annexation and housing market analysis.

Clay and his students have already helped Manti City craft a general plan in 2015. “I spoke with Kent Barton from Manti City,” Nay told Clay and his students. “He spoke very highly of your program and said he could not recommend it enough.”

Kyhl said there were other benefits to getting an up-to-date general plan in place, not the least of which was that the CIB was more likely to fund future projects in the community if they see a city government has been pro-active about planning for the future and setting a current general plan in stone.

Nay and the council told Kyhl and Clay they would be able to make a decision over the next two weeks, and get back to them soon.

Spring City discusses power, gets update on spring redevelopment


By James Tilson

Staff writer



SPRING CITY—The Spring City Council approved the alternative repowering of the Intermountain Power Project (IPP), and heard an update on spring redevelopment.

Dan Eldridge, general manager from IPP, presented an overview of what the “alternative repowering” of IPP meant, and how it would affect Spring City.

Eldridge explained how the IPP was essentially two coal-fired electrical plants near Delta. The electrical energy produced there powered 35 municipalities in California and Utah.

Due to changes in California, IPP would be switching from coal to natural gas, starting in 2020 and going through 2025. Also, the California municipalities would not need 1,200 megawatts, so the plants would power down to 840 megawatts.

IPP has to have approval from all 35 municipalities to approve this change.

Councilman Tom Brunner said he had heard that 400 workers were going to be laid off due to the switch. Eldridge said it would not be that many, but there would be fewer workers. Brunner replied, “I’m not happy with this.”

Eldridge answered he was not happy about the loss of workers either, but he then pointed out Utah has never paid for the energy from the plants due to the contributions from California; so California’s needs were paramount in IPP’s operation.

Also, the whole country is moving away from coal to natural gas, due to natural gas becoming cheaper, along with renewables. Ted Olsen, Spring City’s representative to the Coordinating Committee of IPP, added most of the worker reductions will be through retirement. Younger employees are being “shopped” to nearby industries, or they are being re-trained for the new power plant.

Councilman Chris Anderson asked if the councils don’t approve the change, everything shuts down? Eldridge answered, “Yes.”

Eldridge ended by saying the changeover would have no cost to Spring City; it would keep an energy source in reserve for the city; and it can meet needs for future potential growth. The contract was approved unanimously.

Tyler Faddis, assistant project manager from Jones & DeMille Engineering in charge of the spring redevelopment project for Spring City, said the project schedule is “on track.”

He stated the plans are complete, and have been submitted to the U.S. Forest Service for review. The USFS will complete a cultural review, and get it back to him by that week or the next. The next step will be to submit the plans to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) for wage setting. Faddis hopes to get that back from CDBG by May 17, at which time he will set out the project for bids. Faddis wants to meet with the potential bidders at a May 25 pre-bid conference, at which time he and the bidders will physically inspect the site. And then on June 7, the council would open the bids at the regularly scheduled council meeting.

[Read more…]

[Read more…]

This Hideaway Valley home burned to the ground on Tuesday.

[Read more…]